|
Agency: United
States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA)
Proposal Deadline: October 24, 2005
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Chesapeake
Bay Watershed Education and Training (B-WET) Program was established
in 2002 to provide environmental-based education to students,
teachers, and communities throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
Proposals submitted under this year’s competition should
address one of NOAA’s three areas of interest:
-
Meaningful Watershed Educational Experiences
for Students
The NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office (NCBO) seeks proposals for project
for K through 12 students to participate in a meaningful watershed
experience in the Chesapeake Bay. The Chesapeake Bay and its
tributaries should be seen as living resource that provide a
genuine, locally relevant source of environmental knowledge
that can be used to help advance student learning skills and
problem-solving abilities across the entire school curriculum.
-
Meaningful Watershed Education Experience
and Professional Development for Teachers
The NCBO seeks proposals for projects that provide K through
12 teachers within the Chesapeake Bay watershed opportunities
for professional development in the area of watershed education.
Systematic, long-term professional development opportunities
will reinforce teachers’ ability to teach, inspire, and
lead young people toward thoughtful stewardship of natural resources.
-
Exemplar Programs Combining Teacher
Professional Development with Long-Term Classroom-Integrated
Meaningful Watershed Educational Experiences for their Students.
Systemic, long-term professional development for teachers coupled
with multiple meaningful watershed experiences for students
that are fully supported in the classroom by their teachers
will ensure that the concepts of watershed education are fully
reinforced throughout the school year.
While funds have not yet been appropriated for this
program, NOAA expects approximately $2.2 million to be available
for it in fiscal year 2006. About $1 million will be for Exemplar
Programs that successfully integrate teacher professional development
on the Chesapeake Bay watershed with in-depth classroom study and
outdoor experiences for their teachers. The NCBO expects that typical
awards for B-WET Exemplar Programs will range from $50,000 to $200,000.
About $600,000 will be for proposals that provide opportunities
for K through 12 students to participate in meaningful watershed
educational experiences related to the Chesapeake Bay, and about
$600,000 for proposals that provide opportunities for professional
development in the area of Chesapeake Bay watershed education for
teachers. Projects that represent either meaningful watershed experiences
for students or teacher professional development in watershed education
will range from $10,000 to $100,000. Proposals may be submitted
for up to three years of funding.
Cost sharing is not required under this program, but the NCBO
strongly encourages applicants to share in as much of the cost
of the project as possible. The nature of the contribution (cash
vs. in-kind) will be taken into consideration in the review process.
Priority selection will be given to proposals that propose cash
rather than in-kind contributions.
URL: http://fedgrants.gov/EPSData/DOC/Synopses/1250/NMFS-CBPO-2006-2000265/B-WETChesapeake%26%23032%3BBay.pdf
Go To Top Research
on Research Integrity
Agency: United States Department
of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service
Proposal Deadline: August 16, 2005 for letters
of intent
September
16, 2005 for applications
The following Institutes/Office of the National Institutes of Health
and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality will accept applications
under the “Research on Research Integrity” request for
applications (RFA): National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR),
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS),
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Cancer Institute
(NCI), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA),
and Office of Research Integrity (ORI). The purpose of this RFA
is to foster empirical research on research integrity. The sponsoring
programs (listed above) are particularly interested in research
that will provide clear evidence (rates of occurrence and impacts)
of potential problem areas as well as societal, organizational,
group, and individual factors that affect, both positively and negatively,
integrity in research. Applications must have clear relevance to
biomedical, behavioral health sciences, and health services research.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to take into consideration problems
or issues that have relevance to specific missions of the Department
of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Agency
for Health Research and Quality, or NIH institutes and centers.
For the purposes of this program, "research" is interpreted
broadly to include societal, organizational, group, and individual
aspects of the enterprise. "Integrity" is understood as
"the use of honest and verifiable methods in proposing, performing,
and evaluating research and reporting research results with particular
attention to adherence to rules, regulations, guidelines, and commonly
accepted professional codes or norms." This program seeks applications
for empirical research that will provide information about these
areas in ways that will aid policymaking and help promote integrity
in Public Health Service (PHS) funded research. The above listed
participating programs are especially interested in quantifiable
information that is relevant to particular PHS research communities
and/or research interests. Topics for research that would be responsive
to this RFA include, but are not limited to:
- Standards for responsible conduct (best practices). The sponsoring
institutes and agencies are interested in knowing how standards
for responsible conduct in research are formulated and the practices
these standards endorse or discourage. In proposing studies in
this area, researchers should pay attention to and clearly distinguish
ideal from actual practices.
- Self-regulation. The sponsoring institutes and agencies are
interested in knowing how self-regulation operates in different
research areas and its effectiveness. Studies proposed in this
area should explore both ideals and real practices.
- Factors that enhance or undermine integrity. The participating
Institutes and agencies are interested in knowing which factors
play primary roles in either encouraging or discouraging the adoption
of high standards for integrity in research. Studies proposed
in this area should not only explore what these factors are but
also how they can be influenced or changed.
- Economic, policy, and scientific impacts. The participating
Institutes and agencies are interested in knowing more about the
economic, policy and scientific impacts of research misconduct
and questionable research practices.
Relevant research perspectives and disciplines include, but are
not limited to: anthropology, applied philosophy, business, economics,
education, information studies, law, organizational studies, health
services, political science, psychology, public health, sociology,
and survey and evaluation research, plus the physical, biomedical,
and clinical sciences, including nursing. The NINR is particularly
interested in research that has an impact on patient outcomes. The
AHRQ is particularly interested in research done by health services
researchers on these areas of interest.
The RO1 (research project grant program) award mechanism will be
used for this program. Funding is for up to two years with up to
$175,000 per year in direct costs. Applicants developing new research
areas or assembling new, interdisciplinary project teams should
consider proposing limited, short-term projects to establish the
methods for and validity of the work they propose to do (e.g., $75,000-100,000/year
for one or two years). Larger, longer-term applications should be
limited to major data collection efforts that involve multiple institutions,
phased surveys, detailed direct or on site analysis, or other major
research work that cannot be accomplished in smaller studies.
URL: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-NR-06-001.html
Go To Top
|