May 14, 2012 Newsletter

 

    Institutional, University-Wide, or Cross-Disciplinary Opportunities



    Proposal Submission Reminders (Recently Revised):

    PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING. THESE DEADLINES WILL BE STRICTLY ENFORCED. THE OURS IS NOT EMPOWERED TO GRANT EXCEPTIONS.

    OURS standard procedures require approvals on final budgets and project descriptions from department chairs and college deans prior to proposal submission. OURS and the Provost’s office require that final budgets and chair and dean approvals be received by OURS at least five (5) business days before the deadline (per Provost Welsh’s announcement in the Daily Digest).

    Proposals for which proper approvals are not obtained WILL NOT be submitted.

    Applicants can access the internal approval form at http://www2.towson.edu/research/resourcesforresearchers.asp. Please note that each department and college may have its own internal requirements regarding proposal review lead times; please check to be sure you are complying with your own unit’s procedures. Please be sure the form is completed accurately and fully signed before submitting it to the OURS.

    OURS requests notification of intent to submit at least two weeks prior to the agency deadline so that OURS staff can assist with application preparation and review. All proposals will require signature on behalf of the University, which entails careful review for terms and conditions, University financial, time, and other obligations, and compliance issues. Adequate lead time allows OURS to secure necessary approvals and provide appropriate administrative support on all proposal submissions.

    When submitting proposals via Grants.gov, please be aware that OURS maintains registration for the campus. Like with all proposals, applicants will need to notify and work with OURS in getting proposals submitted through the standard procedures referenced above. For Grants.gov submission, OURS must have the final complete proposal, with all required attachments, no later than 48 hours prior to the agency deadline. Due to the higher possibility of technical difficulties with this submission engine, the OURS cannot guarantee that proposals received later than 48 hours prior to the deadline will be submitted on time.



    Institutional, University-Wide, or Cross-Disciplinary Opportunities

    Data Infrastructure Building Blocks (DIBBs)

Agency:         National Science Foundation
Deadline(s): July 26, 2012 (for Conceptualization Track)
                        August 30, 2012 (for Implementation & Interoperability Tracks)

This program’s specific objectives are to support the development or expansion of new types of digital data storage, preservation, and access that: (1) enable engagement at the frontiers of science and engineering research and education; (2) work cooperatively to overcome conventional barriers due to data type and format, discipline or subject area, and time and place to facilitate sharing of data; (3) combine expertise in cyberinfrastructure; library and archival sciences, computer, computational, and information sciences; and various domain sciences; (4) lead to long-term governance models for economic and technological sustainability over several decades.

Proposals should describe the vision and rationale for the data service and infrastructure, as building blocks must be service oriented, accounting for accessibility, usability and the value provided to science and engineering researchers. The proposal must make a strong case for its likely impact on the target communities, with community support and usage, technology testing and adoption approaches specified.

DIBBS award types are as follows:

  1. Conceptualization Awards , which are aimed at further defining disciplinary and interdisciplinary communities’ data storage and management requirements. The output of such an award will be design specifications for creating a sustainable data infrastructure that will be discoverable, searchable, accessible, and usable to the entire research and education community.
  2. Implementation Awards , which are supportive of development and implementation of technologies related to the data preservation and access lifecycle. Such awards must also address how they will relate and support other CIF21 components essential to the given community. These technologies will enable science and engineering research, such that the scientific and engineering problems serve as use cases for data technology development.
  3. Interoperability Awards , which support community efforts to provide broad interoperability of datasets, enhancing interaction and information sharing to benefit all areas of NSF-funded science, engineering and education. The program supports the formation of Data Interoperability Networks that enable communities to work together in developing effective strategies and tools for data interoperability.

All DIBBS teams/networks are expected to include participation of underrepresented groups. Also encouraged is the inclusion of new researchers, post-docs, graduate students, and undergraduates in relevant activities.

The average size for conceptualization awards is anticipated to be $100,000 for one year; the average award size for implementation awards is anticipated to be approximately $8 million total over 5 years; the award size for interoperability awards is anticipated to be up to $1.5 million total over 3 years. Estimated program budget, number of awards and average award size/duration are subject to the availability of funds.

URL: http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?WT.z_pims_id=504776&ods
_key=nsf12557

Go To Top

Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP)

Agency:        National Science Foundation
Deadlines:    September 28 th, 2012 for Transformation proposals
                       October 30, 2012 for KAT and BPR proposals

AGEP is committed to the national goal of increasing the numbers of African Americans, Hispanic Americans, American Indians, Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders (URMs), including URMs with disabilities entering and completing graduate education and postdoctoral training to levels representative of the available pool of URMs. Increased URM participation in advanced STEM education and training is critical for supporting the development of a diverse professional STEM workforce especially a diverse STEM faculty who serve as the intellectual, professional, personal, and organizational role models that shape the expectations of future scientists and engineers. To achieve this long term commitment, the AGEP program will support the development, implementation, study, and dissemination of innovative models and standards of graduate education and postdoctoral training that are designed to improve URM participation, preparation, and success. AGEP is interested in proposals that include any or all science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields supported by NSF including the social, behavioral and economic sciences, and multi-, cross-, or inter-disciplinary STEM fields.

AGEP intends to support the following types of projects:

  • AGEP-Transformation - Strategic alliances of institutions and organizations to develop, implement, and study innovative evidence-based models and standards for STEM graduate education, postdoctoral training, and academic STEM career preparation that eliminate or mitigate negative factors and promote positive practices for URMs. Note: An institution or organization may serve as the lead on only one AGEP-Transformation collaborative proposal. An institution or organization may be a partner in multiple AGEP-Transformation projects. AGEP-Transformation normal award size will be up to $1,750,000 for 42 months (approximately $500,000 per year including direct and indirect costs) depending on the scope of the proposed project.
  • AGEP-Knowledge Adoption and Translation (AGEP-KAT) - Projects to expand the adoption (or adaptation) of research findings and evidence-based strategies and practices related to the participation and success of URMs in STEM graduate education, postdoctoral training, and academic STEM careers at all types of institutions of higher education. AGEP-Knowledge Adoption and Translation normal award size will range from $200,000 to $350,000 per year (including direct and indirect costs) for up to five years, depending on the scope of the proposed project.
  • AGEP-Broadening Participation Research in STEM Education (AGEP-BPR) - Investigator initiated empirical research projects that seek to create and study new theory-driven models and innovations related to the participation and success of URMs in STEM graduate education, postdoctoral training, and academic STEM careers at all types of institutions of higher education. AGEP-BPR proposals may request up to $525,000 for three years (an average of $175,000 per year including direct and indirect costs).

URL: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2012/nsf12554/nsf12554.htm

Go To Top

Learning Labs in Libraries and Museums Grants

Agency:         Institute of Museum and Library Services
Deadline(s): June 15, 2012

This opportunity supports planning and design activities for spaces fostering experimentation and creativity for middle- and high-school youth in library- and museum-based, out-of-school-time settings. All labs should be rooted in evidence-based research on youth, and should support youth learning in such 21 st century skills as critical thinking, problem solving, communication, collaboration, and STEM.

Each grant will enable grantees to develop comprehensive plans for programs, space, staffing, and budgeting for their Learning Labs. Grants may support the prototyping of certain lab experiences. Also, funds may be used to support emerging labs that are in the process of serving youth with innovative digital media and learning and require additional funds to enhance their efforts.

The primary goals for the Learning Labs grants are to

  • promote museums and libraries as innovation hubs for middle- and high-school youth that facilitate 21st century learning;
  • use current research, design, and programming principles to develop effective spaces for youth that combine digital and traditional media;
  • use traditional and digital media tools for youth learning;
  • build the capacity of library and museum professionals as mentors and creators of effective youth programs and learning environments;
  • increase use of museum and library resources as hubs of effective out-of-school time community networks for learning; and
  • create a network of prototype projects that can provide new models that can be shared and iterated across the museum and library sector. 

Projects must begin on January 1, 2013. Projects must begin on the first day of the month and end on the last day of the final month of the project. Generally, project activities may be carried out for up to 18 months. Grant awards are available for up to $100,000, subject to the availability of funds and agency discretion. Cost sharing of at least one-third is encouraged.

URL: http://www.imls.gov/applicants/learning_labs_guidelines.aspx

Go To Top